Definition
An important model in the context of self-organisation in agile teams is the ownership model listed below. It describes when teams and individuals are able to take responsibility for the tasks assigned to them. Two factors are defined that are relevant for this:
- Degree of freedom of the individual or team The vertical axis of the model describes the degree of freedom of the individual or team. ‘How tight are the guidelines?’ and ‘How much room for manoeuvre is there to make your own decisions?’ are questions that can be used to determine the degree of freedom.
- Level of maturity in achieving goals On the horizontal axis, we see the level of maturity in achieving goals. The level of maturity can relate to both professional qualifications and methodological competences. In the case of an agile transformation, for example, this would be knowledge of agile working methods as well as methods for decision-making within the team.
Different forms of ownership
The expectation of a high-performing, self-organised team is to take ownership of their team's work - in other words, to take responsibility and make decisions. Such a team would be at the top right of the model. To achieve this status, the team needs the freedom, i.e. the permission and opportunity to define tasks and make decisions themselves. But the necessary skills are also of central importance.
Sub-optimal forms of ownership
However, we can also identify two states in the model in which it is not possible or only possible with difficulty for agile teams and individuals to take ownership:
- ‘Locked in’ status: Although the technical and methodological expertise is available, tight guidelines or micro-management severely restrict the scope for creativity. Teams are unable to contribute their skills or innovative ideas in a way that adds value. The result is a feeling of being ‘locked in’. Instead of ownership and taking responsibility, demotivation or resignation sets in (see box below right).
- Floating’ state: Strict structures are abolished in the spirit of agility and self-organisation. Traditional leadership - in the sense of specific work instructions - no longer fits the working model. Teams are given all kinds of freedom from one day to the next, but without the necessary maturity. This includes strategic background knowledge, technical skills and methodological skills, such as how decisions are made within the team. The result is chaos, excessive demands and a feeling of ‘swimming’. Freedom is not utilised and responsibility is not accepted (see box top left).