Self-organisation in agile teams

Self-organisation in agile teams

The Ownership model

Estimated reading time: 7 minutes
What is this article about?

Self-organisation in agile teams enables autonomous decision-making and allows self-organised teams to react quickly to unforeseeable challenges in the VUCA world. In this blog post, we use the ownership model to describe the prerequisites for agile teams to take responsibility and the conditions that prevent teams from becoming self-organised.

There are many ways in which self-organisation can be promoted in agile teams, including through the exchange of information, regular team meetings and decision-making methods that are tailored to the individual context.

Importance of self-organisation in agile teams
Icon Importance of self-organisation in agile teams

What is self-organisation and why is it important in agile teams?

Self-organisation describes the working method of a team that makes decisions independently, drives results in a project or organisation and determines how these results are achieved.

Why is self-organisation so important in agile teams? The answer is their ability to react. The increasing complexity of products and unpredictable changes in a highly dynamic market create unexpected and unprecedented challenges. In this case, an empowered team can make decisions independently in order to respond to the challenge in the best possible and most immediate way.

In contrast to the ‘classic’ approach, there is no need for long escalation loops that waste valuable time. Another advantage of decisions that are made in a team is the broad basis of perspectives and experience.

Self-organisation in agile Teams
The Ownership model

Definition

An important model in the context of self-organisation in agile teams is the ownership model listed below. It describes when teams and individuals are able to take responsibility for the tasks assigned to them. Two factors are defined that are relevant for this:

  • Degree of freedom of the individual or team The vertical axis of the model describes the degree of freedom of the individual or team. ‘How tight are the guidelines?’ and ‘How much room for manoeuvre is there to make your own decisions?’ are questions that can be used to determine the degree of freedom.
  • Level of maturity in achieving goals On the horizontal axis, we see the level of maturity in achieving goals. The level of maturity can relate to both professional qualifications and methodological competences. In the case of an agile transformation, for example, this would be knowledge of agile working methods as well as methods for decision-making within the team.

Different forms of ownership

The expectation of a high-performing, self-organised team is to take ownership of their team's work - in other words, to take responsibility and make decisions. Such a team would be at the top right of the model. To achieve this status, the team needs the freedom, i.e. the permission and opportunity to define tasks and make decisions themselves. But the necessary skills are also of central importance.

Sub-optimal forms of ownership

However, we can also identify two states in the model in which it is not possible or only possible with difficulty for agile teams and individuals to take ownership:

  • ‘Locked in’ status: Although the technical and methodological expertise is available, tight guidelines or micro-management severely restrict the scope for creativity. Teams are unable to contribute their skills or innovative ideas in a way that adds value. The result is a feeling of being ‘locked in’. Instead of ownership and taking responsibility, demotivation or resignation sets in (see box below right).
  • Floating’ state: Strict structures are abolished in the spirit of agility and self-organisation. Traditional leadership - in the sense of specific work instructions - no longer fits the working model. Teams are given all kinds of freedom from one day to the next, but without the necessary maturity. This includes strategic background knowledge, technical skills and methodological skills, such as how decisions are made within the team. The result is chaos, excessive demands and a feeling of ‘swimming’. Freedom is not utilised and responsibility is not accepted (see box top left).
the ownership model

Explained using case studies
The ownership model in practice

In the following, we would like to look at the state of ‘floating’. Particularly in the course of major agile transformations, we often experience situations in our day-to-day consulting and coaching work in which teams are unable to take ownership, i.e. responsibility for their joint work, despite having official freedom. In these cases, the necessary professional and methodological development of the team is underestimated. Let's take a look at situations in agile teams in which people are prevented from taking responsibility due to a lack of structure or too much freedom.

Promotion of self-organisation
Concrete tools and methods

The question that arises after the examples described: How can the competence and maturity level be built up step by step as part of an agile transformation in order to promote self-organisation in agile teams? This is precisely the task that agile coaches support in an agile transformation.

Our agile coaches at LEITWERK provide effective impulses and suggestions, adapted to the level of maturity in agile teams. Specific methods and tools that we use in consulting projects for agile self-organisation are explained below.

working together in an agilen Team

Share information

This measure seems obvious, but its relevance for self-organised teams is often underestimated. The entire team must have access to all relevant information.

For agile teams with a low level of maturity, it is important that the points listed below are implemented and followed up. In this way, the value created by transparency and the sharing of information can be made tangible within the team.

  1. Open strategy Where do we want to develop as a company? What do the framework conditions look like? Employees must be able to answer these questions in order to make decisions in the interests of the organisation. Regular communication of the strategy is an important step on the way to self-organisation.
  2. Daily stand-up meetings or dailies Stand-up meetings are a tried-and-tested method of exchanging information about the current status of work within the team. Each member of the team briefly reports on what they have achieved since the last meeting, what is coming up next and whether there are any obstacles. Through this exchange, team members can uncover synergies or dependencies and share their individual experiences.
  3. Task boards Visualisations create order and increase attention - to name just two of the benefits. A shared task board helps the team to organise their tasks, record specific information and make progress immediately visible.
  4. Team communication A shared team space provides the best basis for direct dialogue. If this luxury is not available, it is advisable to define a common communication channel in times of remote working teams. Chat tools such as Slack or Microsoft Teams enable fast information and data transfer or virtual collaboration.
 Decision-making methods in the team

Decision making methods in the team

The added value that can arise from an agile way of working is rapid decision-making. Specific methods help to support teams in self-organised decision-making.

When and which decision-making method is used depends on the complexity of the decision, the time frame and the importance of the decision. It is important that the team is able to understand which method is best suited to which situation. Clear and open communication and a shared understanding of the decision-making processes support the effectiveness of decisions.

  1. Consensus decisions: While the aim of the consensus method is for everyone involved to agree with the decision, we turn the tables for the consensus method: ‘What serious objections are there to the decision?’ All opinions are heard, but decisions are not blocked by minor objections and teams get to work quickly.
  2. Consultative individual decision: Here, the knowledge of many is combined with the expertise of the individual. A nominated decision-maker, e.g. a topic expert with access to important input providers, prepares a decision and presents it to the team. The team must support the decision as a whole. Otherwise, the process is repeated after specific feedback
  3. Trial and error: This method involves making a decision on the basis of hypotheses or assumptions and then testing and reviewing them. This method promotes creativity and learning within the team by encouraging them to take risks and learn from mistakes.
Establish team calibration and joint learning process

Establish team calibration and joint learning process

Agile teams must develop together. Agile coaches or Scrum Masters consciously use impulses and tools for team calibration in order to iteratively improve collaboration:

These methods can also be used by agile teams themselves to calibrate and improve their performance. However, it is also important that the team regularly checks whether the methods are still effective or whether adjustments need to be made

  1. Retrospectives: Retrospectives are an important tool for calibrating self-organisation as an agile team. At regular intervals, the team reflects together in a retrospective on how cooperation within the team is working, how decisions have been made and which specific measures are jointly contributing to improving cooperation.
  2. Team agreement: In the definition of a team agreement, the mutual expectations of the team members are explicitly formulated and agreements are made. In this way, the team defines its own individual rules, e.g. how they make each other aware when a discussion digresses. Or how they will precisely assess the effectiveness of a meeting.
  3. Building team culture: Now comes the best part. Team days, joint lunches, coffee dates, team events. A team that knows and trusts each other well works together efficiently. There are fewer misunderstandings or personal offences. People ask for help more openly. This means that challenges or problems are addressed at an early stage and solved together.

Self-organisation is an important part of today's complex world
Our conclusion

In today's VUCA world, self-organisation is an important ability for organisations and teams to be successful. It makes it possible to react quickly and flexibly to changes and uncertainties, generate new ideas and drive innovation. However, self-organisation does not happen by itself and there are many challenges that a team must overcome on the way to achieving it. The ownership model shows that building up expertise is an important step on the path to self-organisation. A fast and transparent flow of information, methods for making decisions as a team and, of course, an established learning process - which is indispensable in a complex world - can help.

  • Icon Agile Transformation

    AGILE TRANSFORMATION CONSULTANCY

    Find out more about supporting an agile transformation now.

Do you have any questions on this topic or are you interested in a consultancy service?
Contact us!
Sonja Neubauer - LEITWERK Consulting
Your contact person
Sonja Neubauer
+49 89 189 235 96
...or write us via our contact form.
Contact us!
Search